40. Design equity-driven free college programs.

Finance 09.6.24

Here’s what the federal government can do:

  • Congress should provide matching funds for state-run, equity-driven free college programs that include components such as:
    • Covering the full cost of attendance for students with lower incomes, including tuition, fees, living expenses, and financial safety net packages with allowable uses for books, course learning materials, and transfer withholdings.
    • Covering at least tuition for all students attending public colleges and universities.
    • Including four-year colleges and universities, HBCUs, and TCUs.
    • Providing aid to support students earning bachelor’s degrees.
    • Eliminating criteria for financial aid that limit eligibility for part-time students, adult students, students who do not meet satisfactory grade point average (GPA) requirements (typically a 2.0), and students who need to take time off to pursue workforce opportunities.
    • Allowing for aid to remain as grants and not converted to loans requiring repayment.
  • Congress should request a GAO report to evaluate the effectiveness of free college aid programs and their impact on equity in enrollment and graduation of students with lower incomes and students of color.

Here’s what state government can do:

  • State legislatures should design equity-driven free college programs that include components, such as:
    • Covering the full cost of attendance for students with lower incomes, including tuition, fees, living expenses, and financial safety net packages with allowable uses for books, course learning materials, and transfer withholdings.
    • Covering at least tuition for all students attending public colleges and universities.
    • Including four-year colleges and universities, HBCUs, and TCUs.
    • Providing aid to support students earning bachelor’s degrees.
    • Eliminating eligibility criteria that limits part-time students, adult students, students who do not meet satisfactory grade point average (GPA) requirements (typically a 2.0), and students who need to leave to pursue workforce opportunities.
    • Allowing for aid to remain as grants and not converted to loans requiring repayment.
    • Ensuring eligibility regardless of immigration status and students impacted by the criminal-legal system.

Here’s what institutional leaders can do:

  • Higher education institutions should cover the cost of tuition on a “first-dollar” basis, where award levels are not reduced because of a student receiving other grant aid. Through a first-dollar approach, grants could be used by students for living expenses.
  • Higher education institutions should expand student support programs, build institutional capacity, and strengthen transfer agreements.

Policies to design free college programs should center equity, opportunity, and success for the students impacted most by the affordability crisis, particularly students with lower incomes and students of color. Free college is not a standalone solution and is one of many components that lead to a strong commitment and investment to increase opportunity for all students. Free college, when coupled with support services such as academic coaching, improves retention and student outcomes better than free college alone.[i] Centering equity in the design of free college policies offers states the opportunity to make college affordable once again and increase access to higher education.


[i]Ratledge, Alyssa. “Enhancing Promise Programs to Improve College Access and Success,” MDRC, July 2017, https://www.mdrc.org/publication/enhancing-promise-programs-improve-college-access-and-success.