House Ways and Means Hearing on Legislative Proposals for Paid Family and Medical Leave

View this letter as a PDF here. 

February 10, 2020

The Honorable Richard Neal
Committee on Ways and Means
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

The Honorable Kevin Brady
Ranking Member
Committee on Ways and Means
U.S. House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515

RE:     Hearing on Legislative Proposals for Paid Family and Medical Leave

Dear Chair Neal and Ranking Member Brady:

On behalf of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, a coalition charged by its diverse membership of more than 220 national organizations to promote and protect the rights of all persons in the United States, we thank you for the opportunity to submit our views regarding paid family and medical leave legislation and ask that this statement be entered into the record of the Committee hearing entitled, “Legislative Proposals for Paid Family and Medical Leave,” held on Tuesday, January 28, 2020.

Everyone needs dedicated time off to welcome a new child or to care for themselves or a loved one with a serious illness, but too many families across this country are forced to make an impossible choice between providing for their families’ well-being and making ends meet. The creation of a comprehensive federal paid family and medical leave insurance program would give millions of people in the United States the opportunity to meet their caregiving responsibilities while promoting and protecting the economic security of working people and their families. We urge this Committee to support the bipartisan Family and Medical Insurance Leave (FAMILY) Act (H.R. 1185), a paid leave plan that meets the needs of our modern workforce.

Economic justice and civil rights are inextricably bound. Since our founding, The Leadership Conference has advanced policy solutions to help close gaps and increase opportunities for communities facing persistent disadvantage. More than 80 percent of working people do not have paid family leave through their jobs, and 60 percent lack access to paid personal medical leave through their employer.[1] Working people in the low-wage workforce, those who are the most economically vulnerable, have the least access to paid leave benefits,[2] and people of color have limited access to any meaningful leave benefits, paid or unpaid. About 71 percent of Latinx workers, 67 percent of American Indian and Alaska Native workers, 61 percent of Black workers, and 54 percent of Asian American and Pacific Islander workers are either not eligible for, or cannot afford to take, unpaid leave under the Family and Medical Leave Act (FMLA).[3]

Lack of paid leave makes it difficult, if not impossible, for many people to care for themselves or to provide care to family members at crucial moments in their lives. The FAMILY Act would create a national family and medical leave insurance program to help ensure that working people can afford to take the time they need to address serious health and caregiving needs.

The FAMILY Act would:

  • Provide workers with up to12 weeks of paid time off to address their own serious health issue, including pregnancy or childbirth; to deal with the serious health issue of a family member; to care for a new child; and for certain military caregiving and leave purposes;
  • Enable workers to earn two-thirds of their monthly wages, up to a cap, while on leave;
  • Cover workers in all companies, no matter their size, and make part-time, low-wage, contingent, and self-employed workers eligible for benefits; and
  • Be funded through payroll contributions of two-tenths of one percent each (two cents per $10 in wages) from employee, employer, and self-employed workers, which would fund both insurance benefits and the administrative costs of a new Office of Paid Family and Medical Leave.

The health benefits of paid family and medical leave for new parents are clear. New mothers who take paid leave are more likely to breastfeed, and their children are more likely to receive medical check-ups and recommended immunizations.[4] Families, however, need paid family and medical leave for a wide range of caregiving in addition to parental leave.

More than 75 percent of people who take unpaid FMLA leave each year do so for reasons other than maternity or paternity care.[5] The most common reason workers use FMLA benefits is to care for themselves during their own illness (55 percent), and almost one-fifth of employees take leave to care for a spouse, parent, or child.[6] Changing demographics also suggest that in the coming years, more adults will need elder care even as the number of potential family caregivers will shrink.[7] Most caregivers are also employed at full-time jobs outside of the home and rely on that income to make ends meet.[8] Paid leave allows people to support themselves and their families financially while also allowing them to support family members with serious health conditions, helping them fulfill treatment plans, manage their care, and avoid complications, and for children who are seriously ill, parental involvement in a child’s hospital care may speed recovery, prevent future health problems, and reduce costs.[9] Given the reality of caregiving, it is imperative that Congress support the FAMILY Act, which provides a comprehensive paid leave plan that is inclusive of all forms of caregiving.

The FAMILY Act also provides meaningful, real-time wage replacement for individuals who need to take time away from their jobs. Working families lose an estimated $20.6 billion in wages each year due to a lack of access to paid family and medical leave.[10] Families need a paid leave system that will provide replacement wages, not a system that offers a Child Tax Credit (CTC) loan followed by reduced CTC payments. This plan, the Advancing Support for Working Families Act (H.R. 5296), which would only be available to new parents, would leave out millions of people who need paid time off to care for themselves or a family member, would not guarantee job-protected leave for workers who are ineligible for FMLA, and would result in a $500 CTC penalty for families every year for ten years.

Similarly, a paid leave plan like the New Parents Act (H.R. 1940), which forces new parents to accept lifetime cuts in Social Security benefits in exchange for paid time off, does not meet the economic and caregiving needs of families. Social security cuts would also harm low-wage workers, women, and people of color who are most likely to need paid leave and most likely to rely on Social Security benefits during retirement. By contrast, the FAMILY Act would cut by nearly 75 percent the share of families who fall into poverty after taking unpaid FMLA leave,[11] promoting long-term economic security.

For women of color, the FAMILY Act is especially critical. Women of color still experience pernicious wage gaps that threaten their economic security. Black women, for example, are paid just 62 cents for every dollar paid to a white man. Latina women are paid only 55 cents, and some Asian American and Pacific Islander women are paid as low as 50 cents for every dollar paid to a white man.[12] These inequities together with structural racism in voting, housing, employment, health care, education, and access to capital, have resulted in racial wealth gaps that make it more difficult for women of color to financially withstand a serious family or medical event. Paid leave does not resolve these underlying issues, but it will help women of color make ends meet when they must address serious health and caregiving needs and potentially mitigate the particular harm women of color face as a result of compounded racial and gender inequities.

All working people in America deserve the opportunity to care for themselves and their families without jeopardizing their economic security. The FAMILY Act would create a national family and medical insurance program that recognizes the range of family caregiving responsibilities that people face and provides the support families need to be able to meet those responsibilities. Recent polling shows that eight in ten voters support a comprehensive, inclusive, sustainably funded national paid family and medical leave law. We join this majority and urge you to support the FAMILY Act (H.R. 1185). Please contact Gaylynn Burroughs, Senior Policy Counsel, at [email protected] or (202) 466-3311, with any questions.


Vanita Gupta
President & CEO

[1] U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. National Compensation Survey: Employee Benefits in the United States, March 2019 (Tables 16 and 31). September 2019.

[2] National Partnership for Women & Families. “New Data Show Slow Progress on Increasing Access to Paid Leave and Paid Sick Days,” Sept. 19, 2019,

[3] Pamela Joshi et al, Brandeis University, The Heller School, “Unequal Access to FMLA Leave Persists,” Jan. 16, 2020,

[4] Jody Heymann et al. “Paid Parental Leave and Family Wellbeing in the Sustainable Development Era.” Public Health Reviews (2017), available at

[5] Jacob Alex Klerman, et al., Abt Associaties. “Family and Medical Leave in 2012: Technical Report,” Exhibit 4.4.1,  Sept. 7, 2012,

[6] Id.

[7] Donald Redfoot, Lynn Feinberg, and Ari Houser, AARP Public Policy Institute, “The Aging of the Baby Boom and the Growing Care Gap: A Look at Future Declines in the Availability of Family Caregivers,” Aug. 2013,

[8] National Alliance for Caregiving and AAPR Public Policy Institute, Caregiving in the U.S (June 2015),

[9] National Partnership for Women & Families, Fact Sheet: The Family and Medical Insurance Leave (FAMILY) Act (Sept. 2019),

[10] Id.

[11] Id.

[12] Ariane Hegewisch & Adiam Tesfaselassie, Institute for Policy Research, The Gender Wage Gap: 2018; Earnings Differences by Gender, Race, and Ethnicity (Sept. 11, 2019),; Morgan Harwood, National Women’s Law Center, Equal Pay for Asian American and Pacific Islander Women (Mar. 2019),