Letter to Congress Urging Additional Funding for Election Assistance in Response to COVID-19

View a PDF of this letter here.

April 13, 2020

Dear Member of Congress:

The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, our Voting Rights Task Force co-chairs, and the over 150 undersigned organizations write to urge Congress to pass additional measures that would fully fund and direct states and counties to administer the 2020 elections in a safe, fair, and accessible manner, through the implementation of vote-by-mail and the expansion of early voting and in-person voting options. This is a massive undertaking that requires adequate funding that only the federal government can provide. Congress must provide states with at least $4 billion to prepare for the 2020 November and primary elections, and time is of the essence. In the last coronavirus response package, Congress provided only $400 million to states for election assistance. While a step in the right direction, that sum will defray only a fraction of the costs associated with implementing the necessary adjustments to safeguard the electoral process. In its next package, Congress must provide at least an additional $3.6 billion to help states prepare for 2020 elections amidst the COVID-19 crisis.

In addition, there must be no requirement that states — which are facing exorbitant costs to contain the pandemic and severe damage to their economies — provide a matching fund in order to obtain federal funding for election assistance.  And to help ensure that these funds are appropriately utilized by states, we encourage Congress to institute accountability measures that provide latitude to states while ensuring that the funds are being directly used to ameliorate the impact of the pandemic on voting access. This is particularly important in light of recent reports that states are redirecting these funds to coronavirus response efforts outside the elections context.

Our organizations had previously sought at least $2 billion in federal funding for 2020 election assistance based on an estimate by voting rights experts.  But that estimate was pegged to costs associated with preparing for the general election.  In light of the number of states that have recently postponed their primary elections in response to the scope and magnitude of the COVID-19 crisis, it is now apparent that states will need additional funding in order to safeguard primary elections as well.  The election fiasco in Wisconsin — where voters were forced to risk their health and safety in order to exercise their fundamental right to vote — underscored the tremendous need to provide additional assistance to states during this dangerous and challenging time. Additional funding is needed to ensure that each state can provide a comprehensive approach that includes both vote-by-mail and in-person options safely and effectively.  Unless states offer voters a range of options through which to submit completed ballots, many voters – particularly people of color, Native Americans, people with disabilities, limited-English proficient citizens, students, and other historically marginalized citizens – simply will not have equal access to the ballot box, and the promise of our democracy will not be fulfilled.

Congress must pass additional funding measures for elections

In a March 17, 2020 letter, over 200 public interest organizations outlined several election administration policies that must be implemented to address the current crisis, including the following:

  • an extended early in-person voting period (allowing for voters to come in over a spread-out period rather than in a cluster on Election Day),
  • no-excuse absentee voting-by-mail (including a number of options through which to request and return ballots),
  • expanded voter registration options (including online voter registration and same-day voter registration),
  • prohibition of polling place adjustments that disproportionately impact vulnerable populations (such as people of color, Native Americans, limited-English proficient citizens, people with disabilities, and students), and
  • voter education (informing the public of new practices and immediately quashing disinformation as it arises).

This package of recommendations was created by nationally recognized voting rights experts in consultation with state elections officials who have overseen elections for decades.  These experts and administrators agree that, if states and counties are to run safe and effective elections in 2020, they must have adequate resources to provide both vote-by-mail and in-person options.

The Brennan Center for Justice has estimated that enhancements to vote-by-mail alone will require up to $1.4 billion to meet the costs in the general election of ballot printing, postage, drop boxes, electronic absentee ballot requests, ballot tracking, additional staffing for processing a much larger volume of mailed-in ballots, enhanced technology for signature verification, high-volume mail processing, and high-speed ballot scanners. The 2020 elections will result in an unprecedented number of mailed-in ballots, and states and counties must be equipped to handle this responsibility while ensuring accurate ballot processing and counts.  In addition, Congress must provide emergency funding to the U.S. Postal Service, which is facing dire financial straits in the wake of the coronavirus pandemic.

The Brennan Center for Justice has also estimated that $271.4 million is needed for in-person voting measures in the general election so that states and counties can provide safe polling places per guidance from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (including resources for regularly cleaning and sanitizing facilities and machinery), adequate polling-place staffing, and voting wait-time tools (to ensure social distancing and avoid clustering during an early-voting period); $252.1 million is needed in the general election to ensure that the public is sufficiently educated about voting rules changes and options; and $85.9 million is needed to develop and bolster online voter registration for the general election.  These estimates should be doubled to ensure adequate resources for primary elections.

Vote-by-mail is necessary but insufficient alone to safeguard our elections

Although large numbers of Americans will vote by mail this year, in-person voting options remain essential for the 2020 elections to be truly fair and accessible.  In-person voting is still necessary, notwithstanding the challenges posed by COVID-19, because many communities in America simply will not have full and fair access to the election without in-person voting options and for others it is their preferred option.  Accordingly, we must provide safe and effective in-person voting options, in order to prevent disenfranchising any American.  Unless we do so, marginalized communities will be locked out of this election.

For example, vote-by-mail presents hurdles for Native American voters living on tribal lands, given that many do not receive mail delivery or pick-up at their homes.  In February 11, 2020 testimony before the U.S. House Committee on Administration Subcommittee on Elections, Arizona State University Law School Professor Patty Ferguson-Bohnee explained: “Due to the lack of traditional addresses, ‘[m]ost reservation residents do not receive mail at their homes and either pay to maintain a post office box in a nearby town or receive their mail by general delivery at a trading post or other location. Some reservation residents have to travel up to seventy miles in one direction to receive mail.’  In Arizona, for example, only 18% of reservation voters outside of Maricopa and Pima Counties have physical addresses and receive mail at home.  The Navajo Nation, the largest reservation in the United States—the size of West Virginia, does not have an addressing program, and most people live in remote communities.” [internal citations omitted].  These American citizens would be denied their fundamental right to vote if an all vote-by-mail system is adopted.

Language access and literacy issues can compound these problems since a ballot mailed to a voter in a language they cannot speak or read is effectively useless. Jurisdictions that are required to provide language assistance under Section 203 of the Voting Rights Act must ensure that any vote-by-mail system provides effective language assistance at every stage of the voting process.  That does not always occur.  Professor Ferguson-Bohnee testified: “In 2014, San Juan County, Utah, moved to an all vote-by-mail system that did not account for translations for Navajo language speakers. Navajo voters who needed language assistance were required to travel several hours round trip to the sole in-person voting location to obtain assistance.”

A 2017 study by the Native American Rights Fund analyzed these and other voting barriers for Native Americans and concluded: “Clearly, mail-in balloting presents significant difficulties for some Native American voters. This difficulty could be compounded by a trend toward all mail balloting in some jurisdictions.”  It is crucial to have in-person voting options for voters living on tribal lands.

Voting by mail has been problematic for other communities of color as well.  There have been instances in which absentee ballots have been rejected at far greater rates for voters of color than for white voters.  The Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law noted such statistically significant disparities in Gwinnett County, Georgia during the 2018 mid-term election: only 2.5 percent of white voters had their absentee ballots rejected, compared to 14.8 percent of Asian-American voters, 8 percent of Black voters, and 4.3 percent of Latinx voters.  In addition, a Florida ACLU study found that “younger voters, as well as voters from racial and ethnic minorities, are much more likely to cast VBM [vote-by-mail] ballots that are rejected, and are less likely to cure their VBM ballots if SOE [supervisors of elections] staff flag them for having signature problems.”

Moreover, many voters of color lack faith in the U.S. Postal Service to safeguard voting by mail.  An article summarizing the findings of a 2017 study by the California Civic Engagement Project stated: “The survey found that among respondents who don’t send in their ballots via the mail, nearly half of Asians said they didn’t trust the postal service to deliver their ballots safely and on time. African-Americans and Latinos also mistrusted the post office in larger numbers — at rates of 32 and 29 percent, respectively. Only 21 percent of white respondents felt the same way.”  In addition, a voting rights expert noted that “studies show that voting by mail has not been a magnificent success among low-income communities of color (in inner cities and rural areas), because of higher mobility rates and poorer mail service among these populations, among other factors.”

Voting by mail can also present problems for people with disabilities.  The paper ballots used in a vote-by-mail system are not accessible to some voters with disabilities, including those who are blind or low vision, those with limited or no manual dexterity, and those with limited literacy.  Many voters with disabilities prefer to cast their ballot at a polling place on Election Day, and every polling place in the United States is required to have at least one accessible voting device (equipped with earphones and other types of accommodation). Voters with disabilities who are unable to mark paper ballots without assistance rely on an accessible voting station to privately and independently cast their ballots, as required by federal law.  In 2012, 10% of people with disabilities who voted by mail reported that they had problems with completing their mail-in ballot and needed assistance in filling out or sending their ballot, violating the Help America Vote Act mandate of a private and independent ballot.

Despite its flaws, voting by mail remains an important option, especially in the wake of the ongoing coronavirus pandemic. But there must be guardrails in place, including offering prepaid postage by the government, the ability to postmark an absentee ballot on or before Election Day, reforms of signature matching laws to protect voters of color and allow people an opportunity to cure any discrepancies before their ballots are discarded, and increased availability of drop boxes.  And to ensure full voting access for voters of color, the establishment of in-person polling places and vote centers remains essential. Congress must fund states and counties sufficiently so they can prepare now for these in-person voting options.

In recent weeks, Congress has demonstrated to the American public that it can come together for the good of the nation during these trying times.  We urge you to take the additional necessary steps during your next legislative efforts to address the COVID-19 pandemic to ensure that no citizen is left out as we work together to protect the country and safeguard our democracy.


The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights

Lawyers’ Committee for Civil Rights Under Law


NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund, Inc.


A. Philip Randolph Institute


ADL (Anti-Defamation League)

Advancement Project National Office


African American Ministers In Action

Alliance for Youth Action

American Association of University Women (AAUW)

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees

American Federation of Teachers

American-Arab Anti-Discrimination Committee

Andrew Goodman Foundation


Arab American Institute (AAI)

Asian American Legal Defense and Education Fund (AALDEF)

Asian Americans Advancing Justice (AAJC)

Bend the Arc Jewish Action

Brave New Films

Brennan Center for Justice at NYU School of Law

Campaign Legal Center

Can’t Stop! Won’t Stop! Consulting

Center for American Progress

Center for Civic Policy

Center for Community Action and Environmental Justice

Center for Disability Rights

Center for Independence of the Disabled, NY

Center for Law and Social Policy (CLASP)

Center for Media and Democracy

Center for Public Representation

Center for Science and Democracy – Union of Concerned Scientists

Central American Resource Center

Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington

Clean Elections Texas

Colorado Latino Leadership, Advocacy, & Research Organization (CLLARO)

Common Cause

Common Cause Florida

Common Cause New Mexico

Communications Workers of America

Community Change Action

Community Votes

Council on American Islamic Relations Connecticut (CAIR CT)

Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR)

Courts Matter Illinois

CPC – Chinese-American Planning Council

Declaration for American Democracy

Demand Justice

Democracy 21

Democracy Matters

Democracy Nashville/Democratic Communities



Economic Policy Institute

Education Advocacy Representation & Leadership for Youth – MO

End Citizens United

Equal Citizens

Equality California

Fair Elections Center

Fair Fight Action


Fix Democracy First

Generation Progress

Georgia Coalition for the People’s Agenda

Greenpeace USA

Hispanic Federation

Human Rights Campaign

Impact Fund

In Our Own Voice: National Black Women’s Reproductive Justice Agenda

Indigenous Women Rising


Inspired by Common Cause

Jewish Council for Public Affairs

Labor Council for latin American Advancement

Lambda Legal

League of Conservation Voters

League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC)

League of Women Voters of the United States

MacArthur Justice Center


Maryland PIRG

Matthew Shepard Foundation

Minnesota Alliance for Democracy

Missouri Voter Protection Coalition

Muslim Advocates

Muslim Public Affairs Council


NALEO Educational Fund

NARAL Pro-Choice America

National Action Network

National Association of Social Workers

National Association of Social Workers, CT Chapter

National Bar Association

National Center for Learning Disabilities

National Center for Transgender Equality

National Council of Asian Pacific Americans (NCAPA)

National Disability Rights Network

National Education Association

National Employment Lawyers Association

National LGBTQ Task Force Action Fund

National Organization for Women

National Partnership for Women & Families

National Redistricting Foundation

National Urban League Young Professionals

Native American Rights Fund

NCJW Chicago North Shore

NETWORK Lobby for Catholic Social Justice

New American Welcome Center at the University YMCA

New Jersey Institute for Social Justice

New Mexicans for Money Out of Politics

New Mexico Immigrant Law Center

New Mexico Thrives

New York Immigration Coalition

North Carolina Asian Americans Together (NCAAT)

North Carolina Voters for Clean Elections

Northeast Ohio Voter Advocates

Northwest Kenyan Community Association

NYS Elections Commissioner Association

OCA – New York Chapter

OCA-Asian Pacific American Advocates

Ohio Environmental Council Action Fund

Oklahoma Institute for Child Advocacy


Our Maryland

Parents for Public Schools, Inc.

Peace Action

People For the American Way

PFLAG National

Phillips Temple CME Church

Planned Parenthood Action Fund

Progressive Turnout Project

ProgressNow Education Fund

Public Citizen

Represent Maryland


Rock the Vote

SC Appleseed Legal Justice Center

Service Employees International Union (SEIU)

Sierra Club

Sierra Club Maine

Silver State Equality-Nevada

SMART Elections


SPLC Action Fund

Spread The Vote

Stand Up America

State Innovation Exchange (SiX)

TASH, Inc.

Texas Civil Rights Project

Texas Progressive Action Network

Transformative Justice Coalition


Union for Reform Judaism

United Mine Workers of America

Verified Voting

Voices for Progress


Voting Rights Lab

When We All Vote

YMCA of Greater New York